This week, a friend and I decided to create a short podcast discussing The Office and several of its episodes. All I have to say is savor it, because although it is only our first podcast, it will definitely be our last.
Monday, November 30, 2015
The Office Podcast
This week, a friend and I decided to create a short podcast discussing The Office and several of its episodes. All I have to say is savor it, because although it is only our first podcast, it will definitely be our last.
"The Office Fan" is now on Pinterest!
I decided to join pinterest and create a board all about The Office. Check it out here!
Sunday, November 15, 2015
The Office - "The Injury" Alternate Ending
Soon after, Jim finally
realizes that Dwight has a concussion and decides to take him to the hospital.
Michael, who is Dwight’s emergency contact and who believes that his foot injury
is more serious than a head injury, decides to tag along. Right before Dwight
leaves for the hospital, Pam (who has quite enjoyed the new, nicer, Dwight)
tells “new” Dwight “goodbye” and is a little sad about the fact that next time
she sees him he will be back to normal. Once they arrive at the hospital, the
doctor orders a CAT scan for Dwight. Michael, who is in the room with Dwight,
decides to try to put his foot in the CAT scan machine (even though, moments
before, the doctor told him not to). In the end, it is revealed that Dwight
will be okay and will be back to his normal self the next day.
I personally love this
episode just the way it is and wouldn’t really change anything, but if I had to
change the ending it would be in the following way. As Dwight is getting a CAT
scan and Michael attempts to put his foot in the CAT scan machine, a doctor
immediately tells him to stop and, fed up with the way he is acting, tells him
off, making it clear to him that he is not disabled nor is his foot injury
worse than Dwight’s concussion. Michael, feeling defeated and embarrassed,
doesn’t say anything and remains silent for the rest of the time they are at
the hospital (pouting much like an upset toddler). The doctor, after reviewing
the results of Dwight’s CAT scan, then tells Jim that Dwight’s injury is
slightly more serious than they expected and that he will continue to be the
nicer, more likable, Dwight that he has been all day for the next couple of
weeks. This is good news for everybody in the office as they are bigger fans of
the good-natured Dwight than they are of the “normal,” annoying, Dwight.
For the next two weeks,
Dwight treats everybody in the office with kindness, something he never really
had done before. In the meantime, Michael becomes extremely jealous of all of
the attention Dwight is getting. As a result, Michael becomes even more
obnoxious than he normally is, doing and saying outrageous (yet, for the
audience, fairly hilarious) things in order to get some attention. Because he
is acting worse than normal, Jim decides to pull a prank on Michael (something
he has been itching to do since he hasn’t been able to pull one of his normal
pranks on Dwight because of the state that he is in). Jim, favoring the nicer
Dwight over the annoying Michael, somehow convinces Michael that corporate is
demoting him and making Dwight the new regional manager of the office. Michael
is, obviously, fairly upset while Dwight is ecstatic and begins to run the
office in a far more efficient, and kinder, way. A couple of days pass and
Dwight begins to act like his normal arrogant self, having little sympathy for
his co-workers and starts to implement some very strict rules. Jim, realizing
that his prank has taken a very bad turn, tells Michael the truth. Michael,
although upset, knocks Dwight down a peg and regains his power as the manager
of the office, but at the same time realizes that maybe he would be a more
effective manager if he was a bit kinder to his employees.
Monday, November 9, 2015
Academic Research on The Office
With The Office having been such a big hit during its time on air (and for some time after it ended), it is no surprise that it has been the center of much academic study, with quite a few journal articles written about the show. One particular article by Eric Detweiler titled “‘I Was Just Doing a Little Joke There:’ Irony and the Paradoxes of the Sitcom in The Office,” looks at how the show uses irony in ways that is different from sitcoms popular in the 1990s and earlier. Older shows, such as Seinfeld, used irony as a way to “exploit gaps between what’s said and what’s meant” (Detweiler, 2012, p. 728). Conversely, in The Office “the gaps are often between not ‘what’s said and what’s meant,’ or what’s said and what’s seen,’ but between what’s said and what’s said… or what’s seen and what’s seen” (Detweiler, 2012, p. 728). An example of this heavily discussed within the article is how the character Jim Halpert often will make an ironic facial expression to the camera following something ridiculous that Michael Scott or Dwight Schrute has done. As a result, Jim is established as a “sympathetic ironic guide for viewers” (Detweiler, 2012, p. 729). Not only this, but the article argues that The Office “simultaneously undermines and reinforces the ideals, dreams, and realities of the post-millennial American middle class” (Detweiler, 2012, p. 730). One way this is done, as brought up in the article, is through the depiction of gender roles. Pam, for example, is depicted as someone who conforms to gender roles by being a secretary on the show, but also contradicts those roles by aspiring to be an artist and eventually gaining a higher position within the company.
Similarly, the article
“‘That’s What She Said:’ Gender, Satire, and the American Workplace on the
Sitcom The Office,” by Jessica Birthisel and Jason Martin, discusses how gender
is represented within The Office.
What they found was that the show relies on socially constructed ideas of
gender norms and stereotypes that are present within our culture. For example,
the show situates the characters of The
Office “into masculine and feminine hierarchies within the company,” with
“female hierarchies being less developed than the men’s hierarchies and few
plots revolving around women… reflecting important cultural conceptions about
women’s role in the workplace” (Birthisel & Martin, 2013, p. 68). One way
this is shown is how “when the women interact within the office, it is in the
feminized and domestic space of the party planning committee” (Birthisel &
Martin, 2013, p. 68). What this article ultimately argues, though, is that
although the show does perpetuate these ideas of gender roles, it also allows
for the critique of these ideas. As it states in the article, “through the use
of ‘excess as hyperbole,’ the show satirizes and mocks the figures of
patriarchal corporate authority with which most American workers interact each
day” (Birthisel & Martin, 2013, p. 75).
Lastly, Bore’s article “Negotiating Generic Hybridity: Audience Engagement with The Office” discusses, as the title states, how “viewers engaged with a hybrid sitcom… [one which] embraces a more naturalistic style, using the visual style of a documentary with mobile, fly-on-the-wall camera work” (2009, p. 33). In looking at other research that states that The Office, in its mockumentary format, challenges “the association between documentary and authenticity,” what the article mainly argues is that viewers often ignore the documentary style (and the things that signify this), and instead focus on the “authenticity of its setting and characters” (Bore, 2009, p. 33). For audiences of The Office, the authenticity and the show’s “realness” was judged based on the viewers real life experiences (meaning that the mockumentary style, which can sometimes be used to make things seem more real, really had little to no effect on the show’s authenticity).
Bore, I.
K. (2009). Negotiating generic hybridity: Audience engagement with the office. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies,
23(1), 33-42, doi: 10.1080/10304310802570882
Brithisel, J. & Martin, J. A. (2013). “That’s what she said”: Gender, satire, and the American workplace on the sitcom the office. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37(1), 64-80, doi: 10.1177/0196859912474667
Detweiler, E. (2012). “I was just doing a little joke there”: Irony and the paradoxes of the sitcom in the office. Journal of Popular Culture, 45(4), 727-748. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5931.2012.00955.x
Brithisel, J. & Martin, J. A. (2013). “That’s what she said”: Gender, satire, and the American workplace on the sitcom the office. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37(1), 64-80, doi: 10.1177/0196859912474667
Detweiler, E. (2012). “I was just doing a little joke there”: Irony and the paradoxes of the sitcom in the office. Journal of Popular Culture, 45(4), 727-748. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5931.2012.00955.x
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
The Office: An Image, Content, and Textual Analysis
Stanley, aka Michael's "secret weapon," attempting to play basketball |
In terms of content analysis, those of a non-white race were heavily under represented. In total, there were three African Americans (two of which worked in the warehouse), one person of Asian descent (who also worked in the warehouse), and one person of Mexican descent, while the rest of the cast (which totals to about 15 or more people) were white. When looking at this through a textual analysis lens, it implies that those of a minority race usually work in manual labor positions, and rarely work higher paid positions, which in some ways reflects some inaccurate cultural assumptions that many people in our society make. This idea of minority races working these lower positions can be considered a social construction, one which is inaccurate and stereotypical.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)